Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.
Systematic Evaluation of a Psychiatric Mental Health Unit: Identifying an Economic Healthcare Issue
I. Introduction
This evaluation explores the structure, processes, and outcomes of a psychiatric mental health unit within a community hospital. The goal is to identify a pressing economic issue affecting the unit’s ability to deliver cost-effective, high-quality care. A systematic approach is used to assess operations, resources, staffing, patient outcomes, and financial sustainability.
II. Background of the Facility
-
Type: Inpatient psychiatric mental health unit
-
Setting: Mid-sized community hospital in a semi-rural area
-
Capacity: 24 inpatient beds
-
Population Served: Adults (18–65), many with comorbid substance use or chronic mental illness
-
Payer Mix: Predominantly Medicaid and Medicare (~75%), limited private insurance (~20%), and uninsured patients (~5%)
III. Structural Evaluation (Donabedian Model)
-
Staffing:
-
RNs: 1:6 ratio during the day, 1:8 at night
-
PMHNPs: 1 full-time, 1 part-time
-
Psychiatrists: 1 rounding MD, rotating coverage
-
Social workers: 1 per shift
-
-
Resources: Limited EMR interoperability, minimal telehealth integration
-
Budget Constraints: Reduced funding for non-billable services (e.g., patient education, community outreach)
IV. Process Evaluation
-
Patient Flow: Delays in admission and discharge due to lack of coordination with outpatient services
-
Care Delivery: Fragmented interdisciplinary collaboration; inconsistencies in physical health monitoring
-
Documentation: Inadequate and inconsistent EMR use, limiting quality tracking and billing accuracy
-
Follow-Up: Limited case management results in high readmission rates within 30 days
V. Outcome Evaluation
-
Readmission Rate: 28% within 30 days
-
Length of Stay (LOS): Average of 9.7 days (above national benchmark)
-
Patient Satisfaction: Moderate (67% positive ratings)
-
Staff Turnover: High (25% annually among nursing staff)
-
Cost Impact: Financial losses due to uncompensated care, inefficient care transitions, and repeat hospitalizations
VI. Identified Economic Issue: High Psychiatric Readmission Rates
The most pressing economic issue identified is the high rate of psychiatric readmissions, which significantly increases costs and strains resources. Factors contributing include:
-
Insufficient discharge planning
-
Lack of community-based follow-up care
-
Underutilization of case management
-
Non-adherence to medication regimens due to poor outpatient coordination
VII. Justification for Addressing the Issue
-
Economic Impact: Each readmission costs the hospital an estimated $8,000–$12,000 in direct and indirect costs
-
Resource Drain: Readmissions occupy beds needed for new acute cases
-
Payer Penalties: Repeated admissions may trigger reimbursement reductions under value-based purchasing models
-
Quality Concerns: High readmission rates reflect poor continuity of care and negatively affect quality ratings
VIII. Next Steps & Recommendations
-
Policy Review: Analyze current discharge and care coordination protocols
-
Root Cause Analysis: Evaluate gaps in care transitions and community linkage
-
Intervention Development: Propose a policy solution such as implementing a post-discharge care coordination program
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Assess the potential savings from reduced readmissions
-
Stakeholder Engagement: Involve PMHNPs, case managers, and administrators in developing sustainable models
IX. Conclusion
The economic sustainability and clinical quality of the psychiatric mental health unit are at risk due to preventable readmissions. A targeted policy initiative focused on improving care transitions and post-discharge support is essential to address this economic challenge and enhance patient outcomes.